{"id":144872,"date":"2023-12-19T02:39:48","date_gmt":"2023-12-19T02:39:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/theprojectsworld.com\/?p=144872"},"modified":"2023-12-19T02:39:48","modified_gmt":"2023-12-19T02:39:48","slug":"victims-rights-are-being-treated-as-a-box-ticking-exercise","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/theprojectsworld.com\/world-news\/victims-rights-are-being-treated-as-a-box-ticking-exercise\/","title":{"rendered":"Victims' rights are being treated as a 'box-ticking exercise'"},"content":{"rendered":"
The criminal justice system is treating victims’ rights as a ‘box-ticking exercise’, watchdogs have warned.<\/p>\n
A report, published today, revealed that in some cases, police bickered amongst themselves about taking responsibility for an investigation, leading to delays.<\/p>\n
Numerous failings mean police and other agencies are letting down victims of crime, found a joint inspection by three criminal justice inspectorates.<\/p>\n
The report described how, in one force, crime reports received by the police control room were sent to a shared email inbox and then allocated to investigators.<\/p>\n
‘But we were told once the cases were allocated supervisors often then argued about which team should take the case,’ it said.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
There was also ‘poor communication’ between different parts of the criminal justice system<\/p>\n
‘This had resulted in delays to some investigations.’<\/p>\n
The Victims’ Code was first introduced in 2006 and the latest version sets out rights including a requirement on police and other agencies to keep victims informed about investigations and prosecutions.<\/p>\n
The report said: ‘We found that instead of trying to meet the needs of victims, the three bodies focused on whether they complied with the 12 rights set out in the Victims’ Code.<\/p>\n
‘This focus on complying with the letter of the Victims’ Code, rather than the victim’s individual needs, has resulted in an emphasis on process rather than quality.<\/p>\n
‘We saw some evidence in cases we reviewed that this victim’s right had been met.<\/p>\n
‘But this was often a ‘box-ticking’ exercise with no evidence of the quality of the engagement with the victim or whether it met the individual victim’s needs.’<\/p>\n
One victim of a violent crime described how they only learned of a court hearing by reading Facebook rather than being directly notified by police, while another said: ‘This lack of support severely impacted me.’<\/p>\n
In another case, a victim spent time writing an ’emotional’ statement about the personal impact of a crime, expecting it to be read in court during the offender’s sentencing – but was ‘furious’ to discover it was never passed to prosecutors by police, and had been left languishing ‘on somebody’s desk’.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
One victim of a violent crime described how they only learned of a court hearing by reading Facebook rather than being directly notified by police (Stock Image)<\/p>\n
Police sometimes failed to carry out assessments of victims’ needs – such as whether they were vulnerable – and some that were completed ‘lacked important details’, the report said.<\/p>\n
There was also ‘poor communication’ between different parts of the criminal justice system, added the review by His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services, His Majesty’s Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate and His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Probation.<\/p>\n
The Victims and Prisoners Bill, currently going through Parliament, will toughen the code by making it part of primary legislation for the first time.<\/p>\n
But the report warned that the measures would only help alongside ‘practical changes’.<\/p>\n
‘Care will need to be taken to implement the measures in the Bill in a way that does not reinforce the current emphasis on process without sufficient regard to quality,’ it said.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Police sometimes failed to carry out assessments of victims’ needs – such as whether they were vulnerable – and some that were completed ‘lacked important details’ (Stock Image)<\/p>\n
Inspector of Constabulary Wendy Williams said: ‘The findings in this report are depressingly familiar – once again victims are too often not getting the service they are entitled to.<\/p>\n
‘It is vital the whole of the criminal justice system works together to improve the service it offers to victims.<\/p>\n
‘If the recommendations in our report are implemented I am confident they will help to make sure that quality support for victims of crime is placed at the heart of the criminal justice system, where it belongs.’<\/p>\n
The report, published today, made six recommendations including a series of new ‘minimum standards’ which should be observed by police and other agencies.<\/p>\n
Katie Kempen, chief executive of charity Victim Support, said: ‘This report lays bare the reality that too many victims are being failed by the criminal justice system.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
A victim who spent time writing an ’emotional’ statement about the personal impact of a crime, was ‘furious’ to discover it was never passed to prosecutors by police (Stock Image)<\/p>\n
‘Time and again victims aren’t being referred to vital support services, given the chance to make a Victim Personal Statement, or updated about their case. This isn’t good enough.<\/p>\n
‘Criminal justice agencies – including the police – must be held to account for the service they deliver to victims.<\/p>\n
‘We urge the government to use the Victim and Prisoners Bill to strengthen victims’ rights and make sure that they are monitored and enforced.’<\/p>\n
Victims’ Commissioner for England and Wales, Baroness Newlove, said: ‘Complying with the Victims’ Code must go beyond simple box-ticking.<\/p>\n
‘Police, prosecutors and probation are prioritising process over helping victims. It re-enforces my own view that all too often our criminal justice system hits the target but misses the point.’<\/p>\n